72?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
To vote in the poll click the link below and scroll down.
**********************************************
http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2015/4/25/8466895/st-louis-rams-2015-the-number-to-watch-is-72

St. Louis Rams 2015: The Number To Watch is "72"...
By Douglas M@thenovelroad on Apr 25, 2015

I have mixed feeling after taking a look at the Rams 2015 schedule. Make no mistake: This is a tough season to come for St. Louis. But there's something about it you may not have considered as you try to predict the outcome...

In 1984, the Chicago Bear tallied 72 quarterback sacks, and set the NFL record for a team. (One of the Bears' players - Jeff Fisher - was at the end of his career...)

Wins and losses predictions aside, take a look at the Rams opponents, and think about their offensive lines... Now consider the Rams defensive front seven, considered by many to be the best in the NFL. So I'm putting aside W/L for a moment, and look at possible QB sacks for the Rams' "Wild Bunch"...

Weeks 1 & 16: The Seahawks started the 2014 season off slow, and their offensive line has taken a huge hit with the loss of Max Unger. Not the best unit on this team at the best of times in pass protection, it allowed Russell Wilson to be sacked 42 times in 2014...

In Week 2, the Rams face Washington. The dubious trio of Robert Griffin III, Kirk Cousins, and Colt McCoy combined were sacked 58 times in 2014.

The Pittsburgh Steelers in Week 3 have a great quarterback in Ben Roethlisberger, but he hit the turf 33 times in 2014.

In Weeks 4 & 13, the Rams play the Arizona Cardinals. I have to admit I'm a bit shocked at how few times Cardinals' quarterbacks were sacked last year. Their quietly improving offensive line only allowed 26 sacks.

Green Bay's Aaron Rodgers - who St. Louis faces in Week 5 - benefited from an improved offensive line. He only got mauled for 28 sacks in 2014.

The relentlessly quarterback challenged Cleveland Browns are in St. Louis for Week 7. Brian Hoyer - now with the Texans - and "12 Step Johnny" Manziel were sacked 27. The Browns added Tampa's Josh McCown, but more on him later...

Weeks 8 & 17 find San Francisco's Colin Kaepernick facing the St. Louis defense. "The Colin" was the second most sacked quarterback in the NFL for 2014 - 52 times! (Jacksonville's Blake Bortles wins the "Face Plant Trophy": 55 sacks.)

Minnesota's Teddy Bridgewater - the Rams Week 9 foe - was welcomed to the NFL 39 times in 2014.

The Bears in Week 10 bring the brooding Jay Cutler to the Edward Jones Dome. He had 38 opportunities to sulk last season...

In the 11th game of the 2015 season, the Rams play in Baltimore. Joe Flacco was sacked only 19 times; the least of any quarterback in the NFL other than Peyton Manning (17).

Andy Dalton gets loads of heat from NFL media folks. Winning in the post season may be his Achilles heal, but he managed to only be sacked 21 times last year.

Detroit's gun-slinging Matt Stafford had a career high in 2014. He was sacked 45 times, so he has that going for him... Which is nice...

2015 first pick in the NFL Draft Tampa bay may very well have Jameis Winston as their new quarterback this season. But his agent may want to point out to his client Bucs' quarterbacks were pummeled 52 times last season.

All totaled, the quarterbacks the St. Louis defense will face this season were sacked 447 times... Hmm?

Whether or not quarterbacks sacks actually lends to a winning record is anyone's guess. Yet - as I look at who the Rams will face in 2015 - I can't help but think their defense may very well be drooling at this point? It all comes down to how fast Fisher gets his defense to gel at the starting gate in Week 1. If they come out of the preseason with fire in their eyes, this defense could very well be a sight to see. If they do, keep the number "72" in mind as the season unfolds...

(Statistics source: NFL.com)
------------
What a poll! And 60% of people on here think we can beat 72 sacks...?

I need some of that good smoking stuff. Seems like I recall last year we were all predicting a dominating defense too? But it also seems like we had 40+ points scored against us in the home opener against the powerhouse Vikes. Then we had a total of 7 games where we gave up 30+ points and 2 more where we allowed 26+. So what makes us so much better this year? I guess I could argue the maturation of Donald and Ogletree will help? But getting a year older ain’t helping the experienced Chris Long, JL, Jo-Lonn, etc.

And, I don’t think Fairley is much, if any, better than Langford. Barron (who cost us 4th and 6th picks) doesn’t look like a starter. Mr. Jenks will still be offsetting his pick sixes by getting suckered on long TD bombs. Ayers, Tru, Joyner just don’t sound like All-Pros either. And, in the long run, the success of our D depends on whether the O can stay on the field, make first downs and score TD’s. No defense can routinely spend 35-40 out of 60 minutes on the field and be fresh enough to get crucial 4th quarter sacks.
---------
Yea. That sack city thing is not what I want driving us. We need to sack,pressure, and stop the team. The run is what absolutely killed us again and again!
---------
Rams had 40 sacks on the season last year and only 1 in the 1st 6 games. Just by avg in the last 10 games Rams had 4 sacks per game. So 64 sacks which is under. 72 is a big number.
---------

Yep. We started out 1-4. But I don't put much credence in the possibility of breaking any sack records for a couple good reasons.

(1) a 6 game run with hardly any sacks last year
(2) the inflated stats gained by the D during the 3-game stretch against awful Oakland and Washington teams plus the game against the QB less Cards (and we still lost it 12-6). Take those three games away and rank our D based on the other 13 games. It ain’t pretty.
----------
When I look at our schedule we face something like 5 QBs that are excellent at getting the ball out quick. This can hour us because of all the blitzing we do. If we blitz less I dony care what OLine we face, the odds are always in our favor. But because of the blitzing we have to get there in less than 2 seconds the majority of the time. Because when you blitz theres less coverage allowing guys to get open sooner. But our defensive line is so good we really don’t need to blitz as much as we do. It sounds odd but blitz and sack more…
----------

I think they won't have a slow start but 72 is a shit ton of sacks so I had to vote no.

When the Bears did it Buddy Ryan only had one thing on his mind, Getting to the Fin QB. He also was running the 46 defense that was ,dare i say revolutionary, at the time. While Williams also thrives on QB pressure and has exotic blitz schemes, or so I’ve heard, he isn’t creating a whole new defense for OCs to try to combat. Add in the Fact that the game itself is officiated so much different now than then I think it would be almost impossible for the Rams to hit that number, unless we get the 2012 Cards with Kevin Kolb for 16 games.

The fact that you could basically mug the receivers downfield back then(ala 2001 SB) goes a long way to create coverage sacks. I love our Defense but when you look position to position I think they need a bit more time(with the exception of Quinn) before they are spoken in the same breath as some of those Bears players. Anyway just my thoughts on my No vote. I think we have the best chance this year of any team to do it with our style, players and coaching but I just don’t think anyone will EVER do it again.


 

RamzFanz

Damnit
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
9,029
4.5 sacks a game is a very high bar. I can't see it unless Rams go Gregory or another top pass rusher in the 1st which, to me, would be just crazy. I do think they could very well lead the NFL in sacks this season with a HOT start.
 

brokeu91

The super shrink
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
5,546
Name
Michael
4.5 sacks a game is a very high bar. I can't see it unless Rams go Gregory or another top pass rusher in the 1st which, to me, would be just crazy. I do think they could very well lead the NFL in sacks this season with a HOT start.
It would help if our offense could score points and force the other team to pass
 

Legatron4

Legend
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
9,427
Name
Wes
4.5 sacks per game isn't as hard as it sounds. A couple 8 sack games(which we are very capable of) can make up for the 2 sack games. If any team can do it, it's the Rams.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,081
Name
Burger man
It would help if our offense could score points and force the other team to pass

So true. If there is any legitimate shot at 70 we need help from the offense.
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
If the Rams get of to a fast start on D I say " YES!"(y)(y):D
 

Robocop

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,933
Name
J.
not a single mention about the offense. why do I ask about the offense? because that is what will make the difference in sacks not the defense. if the Rams offense can actually stay on the field and get leads then it forces opposing offenses to throw the ball downfield giving the defense opportunities. if they get 9 or 10 wins then I say they get real close if not hit that number.
 

V3

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
3,848
Sorry, the Rams aren't going to even sniff 72 unless their pass defense improved DRAMATICALLY and their offense actually puts some points on the board and gets some early leads. Teams will only have a chance to break 72 if the opponent is forced to throw the ball more than they want because they're behind.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,425
Name
Dennis
I got all excited I thought the thread was about Tommy Prothro!
$(KGrHqJ,!mIFGrfs+ko2BRw))nwT!w~~60_35.JPG
 

Barrison

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
2,507
Name
Barry
I can hear #SackCity already... Let's prove we got a great DL come week 1 and then we can talk.

EDIT: Scratch that, let's prove we got the best DL in football next year.
 
Last edited:

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,897
Name
mojo
Rams finished 8th worst in the NFL in time of possession in 2014. Not exactly what you call a power running, first down making, chain moving, ball control offense that compliments an aggressive defense like ours. I agree with others that in order for the D to attain record sack numbers and generally wreak havoc for 60 minutes...the offense needs to do better at controlling the clock.

Here are the teams that the Rams were better than:
Minnesota, Oakland, Cleveland, Tennessee, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, Philadelphia*<--- yes Chip Kelly's offense gets an asterisk.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
10,717
Name
Charlie
It would help if our offense could score points and force the other team to pass

There it is. Hard to get sacks when the other team is running the ball in the 4th quarter and we're trying to play catch up. I have a feeling that Bears team was pinning their ears back in the 4th quarter and teeing off on opposing QB's because they had a lot of leads.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,537
The offense needs to score points, and some Sheriffs need to emerge on the defensive side. When people like The Mighty One start butt-slamming QB's, everybody gets fully charged up and trying/screaming to be next! Having Chris rebound from last year's injury could be the tipping point on breaking Da Bears' record. Chris is great and getting his defensive teammates riled up. Having the damn refs call penalties on Quinn's grabby blockers would really cause our chances to skyrocket! If The Incredible Brock successfully clones Merlin Olson's play and Aaron and Nick Fairley get really disruptive, we may have a sack-fest every single damn game. Don't forget about our fleet LBs' and DBs' making vicious scud attacks against the opposing backfield.